Nota Kepada Pembaca

Saya mengalu-alukan ulasan saudara-saudari mengenai topik yang saya tulis dalam blog ini. Bagaimanapun saya memohon saudara-saudari agar dapat menulis secara berhemah supaya perbincangan kita menjadi lebih bermanfaat. Elak membuat komentar menggunakan perkataan-perkataan buruk, bersifat hasutan, fitnah atau menyimpang dari topik perbincangan. Bagi para sahabat yang menulis komen tanpa nama harap dapat menyatakan nama panggilan di akhir komen bagi memudahkan proses komunikasi. - Dr Mohamad Khir


Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Khir has his say on allegations

Former Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Khir Toyo has come under a lot fire recently for purportedly misusing the state agencies’ funds for costly trips, family holidays and personal gain - something he vehemently denies.

Pakatan Rakyat which wrested the state in the March 8 2008 general election has set up a Select Committee on Competence, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) to probe the financial dealings of Balkis (the former Selangor Elected Representatives Wives Welfare Association headed by Dr Khir’s wife), to see if there was any wrongdoing or element of criminal breach of trust in the charity organisation.

Last month, the bosses of Permodalan Negeri Selangor Bhd (PNSB), Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Bhd (KDEB) and PKNS and others testified at the Selcat hearing and some of their disclosures were shocking - that RM1.7mil was paid for DisneyWorld and DisneyLand “technical” trips, RM200,000 for a Jogjakarta trip and that they paid the air tickets for Dr Khir’s maid to go on the trips and that they got instructions from the (then) Mentri Besar to sponsor Balkis events.


Denying any wrongdoing, Dr Khir who chose not to attend the Selcat inquiry, gives his side of the story. He also says that he will never forgive Pakatan Rakyat until he dies for smearing his reputation.

UMNO

Q: It has been a year since the general election with Selangor having fallen to Pakatan Rakyat, how do you see the whole political scenario?

A: I think there are mixed feelings among the public. Some believe Pakatan Rakyat (PR) is doing quite well but some do not. This is based on perception. PR managed to give a good perception about themselves to the public. The low income group are happy because a lot of goodies have been given to them but the business or corporate community in Selangor are not happy because they obviously see the economy shrinking. That is so apparent. Lately the urban areas are beginning to see that the local authorities have failed to improve their basic services.


Q: You contested the Umno Youth Chief post and came in second. What do you think of Khairy Jamaluddin as the new Youth Chief and Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir as deputy minister?

A: Khairy has won and I think he needs to work hard. Without his father-in-law (Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi), I think he needs to work even harder. But first he needs to clear the perception about him. I think the Malaysian public still cannot accept him as Youth chief.


As for Mukhriz - it’s simple. There must be ‘keturunan’ (lineage). His father (former Prime Minister Tun Mahathir Mohamad) was there (in the seat of power) so his child too must be there. That’s Malaysian politics for you. It’s happened before and it’s happened again. It’s a normal thing.


Q: Some say you are arrogant because you used the broom award to shame departments, boasted before the March 8 general elections that there will be zero opposition in Selangor and in a forum after the election you challenged the new PR government to investigate you from head to toe.


A: The broom award was decided by the state government officers and personally I think it was good because that department (that was shamed for non-performance by winning the broom award) got number one placing for performance the following year. The broom award was just to change the mind set.


As for the zero opposition, as Mentri Besar and state Barisan Nasional chairman if I say we are weak, all my people will be disheartened and dispirited. As a general, even if you lose the war, you must still say that you have not. That’s the way to handle perception, feelings and the spirit of our ‘soldiers’. Psychologically everyone does that from Mussolin to Sukarno. How can you lead and say we are going to lose. We will not say that we are not going to lose even if we think we are. It’s a strategy.


As for the forum, some people were saying I am corrupt and they will boo me if I say that I am not. The situation at that time was very wild. So I said what I said to keep their mouths shut. Actually, I am not arrogant but I have my own character in politics.


SELCAT


Q: You have been at the centre of a lot of controversy lately. How have you been responding?


A: It’s all politically motivated. Pakatan Rakyat is trying to hide their own wrongdoings. The present MB (Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim) also has a case, one of the exco member also has a case. They are trying to cover up all these things.


For example, the Balkis issue. I am not even a member and Balkis has already been dissolved and the dissolution has been approved by ROS. I was investigated by the police over the Balkis issue and the police found no wrongdoing but still Pakatan is harping on it. But I am not worried. As for the trips (which has now become controversial), as far as I am concerned I paid for my own children.


Q: Why did you not go to the Selcat inquiry to defend yourself?


A: My lawyer advised me not to go. It is a one-sided hearing. Selcat called me on Balkis issue but I am not a Balkis member so there is no locus standi for me to talk. I cannot clear my name because it is a structured hearing. Selcat is made up of my political opponents. The only two Barisan members in it went for the hearing the first day and stayed away after that. And Selcat wants me - their enemy - to appear before them? If you and I are fighting, would you have something good to say about me? If I go to Selcat, it is like I serah diri (surrender) before my political enemy. They are not interested in the truth. They are just trying to look for kesalahan orang (find fault). If they are after the truth, they would have had professionals not politicians conducting the hearing. If it was conducted by ex-judges and non-partisan ex-top civil servants, then I would have gone. But in this case, tell me why should I go to the lion’s den? Besides, Selcat did not get the approval from the AG to set it up.


Q: But this comes under the Selangor state government and assembly, surely they don’t need the A-G’s approval to set up Selcat?


A: I checked with my lawyer. Any law that involves enforcement must be done by the Federal government first of all. They have said they want to jail people and stated that they can jail up to two years and fine RM2,000. Who is going to jail the person? Does the state have the authority to do this? Surely this comes under the police. Selangor has a Public Accounts Committee - why can’t use that mechanism? But they formed Selcat just to pick on people.


Q: You say there is no locus standi for you to attend an inquiry on Balkis but some of the money in question came from PNSB of which you were the chairman?


A: This falls under the Registrar of Societies. For example I am an Umno member and if I donate money to say MIC do I have the right to ask questions about the money of MIC and ask details about the MIC management? I can’t. This is a donation from a private company to Balkis. That’s why there is no locus standi. In fact even the state government doesn’t have the right to ask these questions because they are not members. I have checked with my lawyer. They can’t.


Q: But (former Selangor MB) Tan Sri Mat Taib’s wife, Puan Sri Asbi (Rohani Asnan) who was Balkis president (until 1997) attended the Selcat hearing?


A: That is up to her. I asked the lawyer’s opinion and (he advised me against it) and so I wrote a letter to Selcat explaining why I was not coming. Because I am not a Balkis member so how can they can ask me about Balkis issues.


Q: What was the purpose of the Dec 17-24 2007 DisneyWorld, Miami Beach and Honolulu trip?


A: It was a technical visit. It was for investment purposes, river management, canal city and the theme park. We wanted to make a second Klang Valley in Selangor - an RM1bil canal city from Sungai Kuala Langat to Sungai Klang which is about 16km. There was to be an artificial beach, a river fishing area, boating, a garden in the middle and cycling lane and walkways. The water level would be maintained throughout the year. You should have a look at the canal city plan. It is very nice. So the trip was to visit water feature development areas so that we know how to do it technically in Selangor and translate the concept to reality. That is why we had in our delegation the Yang Di-Pertua (YDP) of Kuala Langat, of Sepang, the DO Sepang, the DO Kuala Langat, town planners and technical officers. They want to see with their own eyes what it looks like, only then can they execute. My trips are always multi-purpose. We meet the business community there to try and get more investments.


Q: Why didn’t (PNSB CEO) Datin Khairiyah (Abu Hassan) say that? When Selcat asked the purpose of trip, she said it was to study the theme park and did not mention river management?


A: She made a mistake. She has to look through the minutes of PNSB again. The trip was partly to study the theme park and partly to study river management and canal city project. I am very sure about that. I am the one attending the programme so I know this.


Q: Datin Khairiyah said your delegation did not meet anyone from the Disney World management team?


A: The arrangement was done by the PNSB management. On the itinerary, there was supposed to be a meeting with them but I don’t know why they cancelled it. You cannot blame me for it.


Q: You said you do not know why they cancelled a meeting with the Theme Park management?


A: Yes. I don’t know. The PNSB management should know. They sent a Recce team there earlier and everything should have been okay.


Q: It cost RM366,000 to send the Recce team ahead and yet they could not organise a meeting with the Disney World Theme Park? Are you saying the PNSB officers are not competent?


A: The Recce team was decided by management not by board.


Q: Why couldn’t they just call or e-mail to fix an appointment? Why do they have to go all the way there to fix the programme?


A: All this was decided by the management. I am the chairman (of the board) and they are the ones who set the programme and I just go for it. In fact sometimes the programme just comes to my table where to meet etc and I just follow. I did not ask for this and that. The PNSB management decided and I just followed.


Q: The Canal Development project between Sungai Kuala Langat and the Klang River is not something new. It was already proposed in 2006 and universities like UKM and Uniten have already had papers on it and discussions on the concept.


A: Yes, but after one year, the officers still did not understand the technical things about how to manage river development and all that. They wanted to have a look at what it is. That’s why I brought the technical team to study and look in detail water feature developments. A year ago we had already completed the concept of the canal city, only after this (concept paper) was completed that we go and visit.


Q: Why go to Miami Beach and Honolulu and not Venice Italy which is known for its canals?


A: PNSB suggested this to us. I don’t choose. I just follow. In fact, I had to put it off a few times because I had no time. We wanted to learn about water-feature development. We were planning an artificial beach in the Canal City so we went to these beaches (Miami and Hawaii) to learn how to develop these areas - like how many feet development should it be from the water and how to maintain the sand. In Malaysia, we tend to develop right to the water front, when in fact you must leave at least a 20 to 30 feet distance from the water. We also don’t want development projects to cause river banks to collapse (due to a lack of technical planning in developing the area around it). The technical department didn’t approve the project because they couldn’t understand the concept and couldn’t visualise it, so we said ‘then okay let’s go and learn from them’ (the experts).


Q: Why was the delegation so big? Why not bring only 10 or so people?


A: I don’t remember how many came along. When we went, developers came along too. They too want to learn about the river development and canal city development. On my part, I brought along two District Officers, Town Planner, YDP, the state secretary and the PNSB board of directors. The developers, of course, paid their own way.


Q: And why not just bring the experts down to Selangor to train the officers?


A: The thing is the technical group here do not understand the concept. They want to have a look at such projects themselves so that is why we brought them there. Besides, bringing consultants and experts down would be more expensive. The canal project is about RM1bil and foreign consultants and experts would cost about 18% of that. And that does not even include the cost of flying them down. Another thing too is that we also need to expose our officers because they are the ones who are going to approve the project. These departments need to see the project otherwise they won’t approve.


Q: Are the trips to reward the officers?


A: No. There must be a purpose to the trips. We bring officers in charge of the Kuala Langat and the Klang River area. And now because of that, they are better and better because they have more knowledge. Otherwise the officers do not know how to do it. If you talk about the barrage, the officers cannot visualise what it is like. They need to go there and learn. That is the problem with our officers these days. If we don’t give them the exposure, they don’t know. You should have a look at the canal city plan. The concept is the first in Malaysia on how to combine water, humans and development. We had the concept already in 2006 and now the trips are how do to translate that to reality. That’s why we brought YDPs, District Officers, the town planner, the state secretary and the PNSB board of directors. We can have sand, the canal and development.


Q: So the officers are sufficiently knowledgable now?


A: We have had discussions with MTES (Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Selangor). In fact, because of their exposure, many regulations in development have been changed. Instead of having the river running along behind the house near the kitchen area, the front of the house is built to face the river. We managed to change so many concepts. It’s good exposure.


Q: Why did you not ask the officers who went on the trip to go to Selcat to give their side of the story?


A: Selcat did not call them. That’s why I think it’s all political motivated. They could have called the state secretary or the others who went on the trip. But the hearing was very structured. The questions were very structured. They didn’t want to find out who is right or wrong. All they wanted was a one-sided story. The purpose is just to tarnish my name. That’s all.


Q: How come PNSB paid RM110,000 for your presidential suite in Honolulu?


A: I am not sure. It was all organised by them. And I didn’t ask. I didn’t even get to enjoy the suite or the facilities. I just used it for sleeping. I returned from the programme at midnight and by 8am I am up.


Q: People are shocked by the RM1.7mil spent for the Disney trips?


A: That was decided by the management. I am actually a very simple man. I do not ask for these kind of things. Maybe they said as a chairman, that is my entitlement and they did that.


Q: You say you are a simple man but people would disagree because you fly first class and stay at expensive presidential suites?


A: You must remember when I was the (PNSB) chairman. I have my entitlement. If I were to reduce my entitlement to what an officer gets then what is the officer going to reduce to? I am the chairman. There is the deputy chairman, board of directors, government officers going along. If I fly business class (not first class), then what happens to my state secretary? He will complain. If I am travelling alone it is easier. But I am travelling with a group of people and if I downgrade myself - it’s a problem for the others. But I never ask (for the pricey presidential suites or first class flights). Whatever they provide, I go along with. I just tell them to give me a full itinerary on these trips. I want a full programme with investors and companies.


Q: But isn’t the RM1.7mil spent on the Disney trips wasteful?


A: No. The trip has so many purpose. Look at the effect, the officers got good exposure. And we get to bring investments to the state. Usually when I go on these trips, my programme is packed from morning to midnight to visit companies, factories, business associates, governors. That’s how we have increased the state’s investments from RM4bil a year to more than RM6 to RM7 bil a year. The RM1.7mil spent used proper channels and we got RM50bil investment (over the last eight years). If we spend RM5 mil for trips but it brings in RM50bil worth of investment, what’s wrong with that? Just look at Selangor now. The RM11.8bil last year was the result of my investment not Pakatan’s. They just try to take credit for it. But now investments have dwindled to RM6bil. I worry that it’s going to wind down to RM4bil. And we used to get RM17mil from sand mining but when PKR took over the state, they got only RM3mil. And they promised the people that they could collect RM250mil for sand mining. As far as I am concerned all the trips I made bring a lot of development to Selangor and introduced new concepts. The ideas come from these trips. I stopped over in Dubai for few days because I got the Sepang Gold Coast idea from Dubai’s The Palm development. I don’t know why the state cancelled the River Canal City project. They should proceed because it can spur the economy.


Q: During the technical trip you went to Kennedy Space Center and visited Disneyworld?


A: Selcat should get every information and see the real itinerary of our visit. I am not crazy to use government money for leisure trips. Sometimes on a technical trip, we have meetings after meetings for six hours or the whole day and if there is a break in between, we can fit in some leisure time too. Why not? I am a workaholic and when officers accompany on these trips they get angry because it is one meeting at 8am, followed by another at 10am, another business lunch, followed by more meetings and at night official dinners. Every one of my trips so far is like that. You can ask my state secretary or officers to confirm this.


Q: Why did your family and maid go along on these ‘technical’ trips?


A: When I move around, I do bring my family but all that is paid by me.


Q: But PNSB said they paid the flight for your children and maid for the trips?


A: As far as I am concerned I paid for my maid and children. I don’t know why she (Datin Khairiyah) would say they paid. Maybe she is against me. And why would the management pay? I paid for the flights. So why did the PNSB management pay again? Look, I am the chairman. I am not the management so I wouldn’t know if they paid for it again or not. But the management should take responsibility for that. They shouldn’t pay my personal expenses or flight tickets for my maid and children. If they pay for my family and don’t inform me, how am I supposed to know they did that (because I am not part of that decision making process).


Q: So you are denying that state funds were used for the maid?


A: I checked and the answer is ‘no’.


Q: What was the purpose of RM201,000 Jogjakarta trip?


A: The trip was to study the batik industry and also river management. There was a garbage problem at Kuala Selangor where there is the fireflies (attraction) and we wanted to see how to take care of that. Their (Jogjakarta) river management is very good. It was JPS (the Irrigation and Drainage Department) that asked us to go for the trip.


Q: On that Jogjakarta trip, Malaysia paid RM10,000 to Indonesian dancers to welcome the Malaysian delegation. Isn’t that odd?


A: You shouldn’t ask me. I was there as a guest . I don’t know the details. I am the Mentri Besar and I don’t ask all that. I didn’t know RM10,000 was paid for the welcoming ceremony. All that was decided by management. That trip, the itinerary was all decided by the management. I am the chairman so I am in the board. The board meets only about three to four times a year but it is the management (of which I am not a part of) that runs the company. They meet almost monthly. I attend their meeting only three to four times a year.


Q: Your former chief secretary Norzatun Ain Mohd Kassim told the Selcat inquiry that you asked her to write a letter from your office on behalf Balkis to seek an AP bring in RM40,000 worth of imported Indonesian batik which was being held at Port Klang but this was finally rejected by MITI because it had to protect the local batik industry. But doesn’t this shows a misuse of your office?


A: I can assure you there was no letter from me to Miti. In any case the AP was not approved, so it is a non issue.


Q: PNSB’s Datin Khairiyah said PNSB paid RM14,900 for business class flight tickets to Melbourne for your wife to visit your son who is studying there?


A: No. I have checked that up already. I am very sure that my wife’s ticket was paid by me for that trip.


Q: Then why would she say PNSB paid? And why did Datin Khairiyah accompany your wife?


A: I don’t why. She didn’t tell me. You should ask Datin (Khairiyah) why she went along. She can’t say there was an instruction from my wife because who is my wife to give such instructions.


Q: The Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Bhd (KDEB) said it spent RM550,000 sponsoring four Balkis dinners at Sunway Lagoon on July 24, Aug 2, 3, 4, 2007 while PNSB too donated another RM300,000 for them?


A: It was for fund raising and we got RM6mil for charity.


Q: Logically speaking why have four charity dinners held almost consecutively which cost a lot of money instead of just one?


A: They had too many people coming for it so they had to break it up in smaller groups. If they do it at such a grand scale, it would cost even more so it was better to split it up and have small programmes with different guests.


Q: There was a Balkis event where KDEB paid RM25,000 for chocolates which were to be given as souvenirs while buying imported chocolates would have cost less?


A: You can’t ask me all these details. I wouldn’t know. All this was decided by the management. For example, Tan Sri Khalid (Ibrahim) he wouldn’t know how much the chocolates cost. He wouldn’t have time for that.


Q: KDEB also paid RM17,000 for tickets for Balkis to go to China to buy artificial flowers and caps there when the company has a branch in Kepong. Why waste money when the ordering could have been done in Kepong?


A: I really don’t know. But it must have been approved by the KDEB management. It might be cheaper to fly there and order it from there. You know how cheap things are in China. What costs 10 sen there costs RM10 here. I know my wife very well. She is very careful about accounting. She’s far-sighted and always thinking about how to save money. Perhaps that’s why she bought so many flowers and caps for the welfare programmes one shot - to save money And she gets really frustrated when the public thinks otherwise.


Q: PNSB said they had to give Balkis about RM1mil each year?


A: Yes, that was a decision by PNSB. The 1mil is for charity. Balkis uses the money to help the needy. During Chinese New Year, they give RM100 to 1,000 poor Chinese, for Hari Raya they give money out to poor Malays and during Deepavali, it goes to poor Indians. And we don’t ask the people to sign invoices to show that they got the money. Balkis does many welfare programmes. They buy wheelchairs, and prosthetic limbs for the disabled and fund dialysis treatment for the needy.


Q: KDEB, PNSB and PKNS all said that they became like a ‘tukang bayar’ because whenever there was a request from Balkis they felt obliged to pay.


A: They should have brought it to the board if they were unhappy. Balkis is a welfare organisation which does work for charity. These companies have put aside a certain amount for charity (under their Corporate Social Responsibility programme). And they can channel the money to any clubs or charity. They can sponsor sports, Balkis or give it to old folks homes. In fact, KDEB sponsors football programmes more than it does Balkis events. The companies decide where to give the money to. As far as I am concerned the money is not misused. And the money Balkis gets does go to the target group (welfare and they needy). That’s what is important.


Q: But this puts bodies like PNSB. KDEB, PKNS in a dilemma because you were after all their Mentri Besar (from 2000 until the March 8 general elections) so how can they say ‘no’ to Balkis. They had to accord Balkis, which is headed by your wife, special treatment?


A: Even if Balkis made a request, the management has the right to turn it down. They can’t be ‘segan’ (embarrassed). Where does the money go? If the money goes to charity, then it’s okay. What’s wrong if it goes to the poor, old and the needy. But if it goes to certain people’s pocket that’s a different matter. What the company donates goes to charity and not to individual’s pocket. Balkis does not benefit from it. Sometimes, the money is not enough and Balkis has to top it up with their own money.


Q: But did you make calls and give verbal instructions to these bodies to fund Balkis activities?


A: No I never made any instructions. It was all done through the board of directors and went through the proper procedures. I am very sure about that. For me, in the eight years, I never called a single officer up and asked them to do things without going it through meetings first. I discuss everything in the board and jot things down. I don’t like not to be responsible for what was decided so I would jot down every instruction. And I give instructions in the meeting not outside.


Q: But the bosses at PNSB and KDEB said they received many requests from you, verbal instructions to pay for Balkis?


A: No. Can they prove it? Which letters have I signed?


Q: They said the requests were verbal?


A: No. Never. You can check my phone bill. I never call. They are trying to save their own skin. I never call. Instructions must be written. I never use my office for my own personal gain. I never do that. Maybe some officer down the line just said “the MB said to do it”.


Q: PNSB, KDEB, PKNS are all saying ‘yes you did’ but you are saying ‘no I didn’t’. Who is telling the truth?


A: I never call. If you want to be sure you can check my phone bills throughout the years.


Q: So you are saying that they are all ganging up against you?


A: That’s the problem. They want to protect themselves. That’s why I can’t go to Selcat because Selcat is my enemy. It’s not transparent.


Q: If this is the case, aren’t you angry with them for doing this?


A: No, why should I be angry. I don’t even have any power anymore (as I lost the Mentri Besar post).


Q: It was also disclosed at the Selcat inquiry that PNSB had to pay the salaries of three workers who worked exclusively for Balkis?


A: They are actually PNSB staff. They were just loaned to Balkis to help out like once a week or something like that. They are not doing it full time.


Q: There was also this Chinese New Year event organised by Balkis that you went to officiate where your wife who is the Balkis president asked PNSB to sponsor a RM3,600 Summerman suit for you as a souvenir for officiating the function?


A: That is a token of appreciation. It was decided by the management. My wife would never make such a request. I am very sure of that. My wife doesn’t interfere at all. She doesn’t go to my office. When I officiate a function, I don’t have a clue what I would get as a souvenir. It is up to the management to decide what to give. And my wife is certainly not involved in the management of PNSB (so how can she influence a decision on gifts) Actually I appreciate books as a souvenir. For me that is best. If I attend a function and if they give me some other gift, it would be very rude to reject it. But I appreciate books most and I have my own library now.


Q: When say the Prime Minister and his wife comes for functions in the state, do you give out expensive gifts costing RM40,000 to RM60,000? There were reports that KDEB had paid RM65,000 for songket for dignitiaries at a Balkis function?


A: We have to give them something special from Selangor. Every state is doing that. That’s normal.


Q: Why did PNSB give you a Patek Philip watch worth RM159,000?


A: I told them they shouldn’t have done that and I turned it down immediately. It was too expensive a gift. I was quite surprised. I never asked for anything that’s why I returned the watch. I told them you better sell the watch back and get the money back.


Q: What is behind the RM338,000 Balkis organised Sporting event where RM131,000 was spent on tracksuits?


A: It was a Bakti programme. States take turns organising it every year. It is attended by the wives of the ministers and the Prime Minister and deputy Prime Minister turn up with their wives. And we gave out a tee-shirt and a tracksuit. When Kedah hosted it, they gave the sports attire, so did Penang. And when it was Selangor’s turn, we too would give. It is after all once in 14 years. And there were four teams so that is why there were track suits in four colours.


Q: There was a report that Balkis received RM100,000 for a SPM programme?


A: These kids come from needy background and because of the Balkis programme some of them got all As.


Q: Have you spoken to your wife about the Balkis issue and what has she been saying?


A: She said everything has been done according to procedure and no money has spent for her own purpose. It was all done for the welfare programme to give the needy.


Q: When is she going to clear her name?


A: There is no need. If we answer, then someone will say something else and it will go on and on. Let God decide who is right.


Q: Why did you buy 12 units of the Al Marwa Tower in Mecca for RM25mil when PNSB had only given approval for the purchase of 5 units for RM8mil?


A: When I was in Mecca, there was this offer from this Mecca group for the apartments. So many people came and were fighting for it because it was in a prime area. It was on a first come first serve basis and we (PNSB) wanted to get five. Then one of the Indonesian companies withdrew and their seven units were offered to us and we took it. But settlement had be done in cash and within 14 days otherwise we would lose the deposit. At that time PNSB did not have enough money so instead of losing the deposit we got another buyer to buy it within 14 days. The apartment is in Mecca so only Muslims can buy it. For that reason too, the apartment units cannot be under the PNSB name because there are non-Muslim directors in PNSB. This is why as chairman I put it under my name. The name should be under whoever is the PNSB chairman and now that’s Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim. I signed three times to transfer the name to his. In fact, I was the one who requested for the transfer of name for the apartment units. I had called state secretary and said ‘let’s settle this because the apartments do not belong to me and I don’t want it.” That’s the whole story.


Q: Was it a good investment?


A: Yes, very good. Now I think the five units which cost RM8mil in 2007 are now easily worth RM12mil easily. It’s very exclusive. It’s the only property near the Kaabah and just about 60m away from the Holy Mosque. You can see the Holy Mosque from the apartment. And we fought like hell to get the units.


Q: PR has raised questions on the transaction about whether it contravened the Exchange Control Act and Anti Money Laundering Act?


A: How can we transfer such a huge amount of money from here to Mecca without approval from Bank Negara? Come on lah. We are talking about RM25mil. So was I wrong to go after a good investment. The value has more than doubled now. I personally stood in the queue for four hours to get it. One Arab man offered me RM200,000 just to change the name of the booking to him but I refused. That’s why I am really frustrated and that’s why I won’t forgive Pakatan. I don’t get a single sen from it. It was for the state. The intention was for investment.


Q: There are lots of questions over the numerous technical trips you made overseas to US, Paris, Hong Kong, Tokyo which are costly?


A: As far as I am concerned all the trips have all been very successful. That’s why I bring a lot of officers to give them exposure. The trips are multi-purpose and bring in investment and give us ideas. I did nothing wrong so I have nothing to worry about. As for the personal trips, I made my own.


Q: Do you agree that the issue has smeared your reputation?


A: Yes, That’s why I won’t forgive them till I die, until Akhirat (the end of the world). The people will come to know the truth later on. The people are restless and fed up with this kind of gutter politics.


Q: Are you suing the state government?


A: I am looking into it.


Q: This issue has tarnished not just your image but also that of Umno?


A: That’s why I won’t forgive them. Maybe when they got into power, they forget that God is there. When you do something bad to people, one day God will do something bad to you. Wait and see. Time will decide.


Q: How are you going to repair your reputation?


A: I will go down to the people. I will talk to them about what Pakatan is doing to the country, to the state now. They bohong banyak (lie a lot). They said they were planning RM10bil for the Klang River development programme and I have waited more than 3 months and there is nothing. Don’t bluff the people. That is the whole reason they want to suspend me so that I will not raise the issue.


Q: Is your conscience clear?


A: Very clear. If they do this to me and expect me to keep quiet, they are talking to the wrong person. I will continue to speak up because I love Selangor very much. I will talk because I know what they are doing. Even if they suspend me from the state assembly, they can’t prevent me from talking to the public. I will keep talking. Because far as I am concerned my job is to advise and tegur (criticise).


Q: Do you think people will believe you?


A: I think so. I still got the number two spot in the Umno Youth Chief elections. As for the public, when I go around I still draw in crowds. For example when I went to campaign in the Bukit Gantang by-election, so many people came to my ceramah. This happens everywhere I go.

-- Sunday Star

29 comments:

  1. Salam...
    Saya rasa DSKT perlu banyak bersyukur kerana allah masih sayang pada DSKT dengan menarik semua nikmat yang ada sebelum nie....semua nie berlaku ada hikmah dia. Kalau DSKT tidak kalah dalam PRU12 lalu, mesti banyak lagi "Kekeliruan" yang mungkin akan berlaku...apa pun sekali lagi saya harap DSKT bebanyak bersyukur..

    ReplyDelete
  2. DRKT,

    take sabbatical leave for 1 yr n attend a post graduate course in Havard to rebrand your leadership.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Terlalu sakit telinga dan mata mendengar serta melihat apa yang ditulis disini.

    Orang bukan buta, pekak dan tidak bodoh lagi sesampai tidak dapat mentafsirkan kesemua disini.

    Banyak alasan macam, "sebagai Chairman", "I do not know this or that because the management decided which I have no control" dll semata-matanya untuk taichi segala aksi yang Dato Seri serta isteri telah buat daripada yang benar. Bolehkah kesemuanya ini coincident?

    Tak payahlah hujahkan disini. Berani kehadapan dan berdepan dengan SELCAT untuk menjawab soalan mereka sekiranya betul, benar dan telus. Jangan beri alasan bahawa SELCAT adalah dengan tujuan sengketa melawan. Pergi dengan hati iktibar yang tidak takut kerana Allah akan berbelah sesaipa yang tidak melakukan kesalahan, malah gagalnya berhadapan bermakna ketakutan benar diketahui. Ingat Allah masih berkuasa dan akan meneliti sesiapa yang betul dan benar atau sebaliknya.

    Seperti dikatakan, "Manusia bercadang tetapi Allah mengarahkan", harap Dato Seri sedar akibatnya diakhirat nanti.

    Lebih-lebih lagi, sebagai seorang Muslim, Dato Seri telah melanggar kehendak Allah dimana Allah memerlukan setaip orang Islam supaya bermaafan orang lain. Takkan kerana politik, sampai tidak ingat agar kehendak Tuhan ini? Ini harus disanjung tak kisah siapa yang betul dalam hal-hal yang banyak serupa ini. Harap maaf teguran saya disini, cuma demi kebaikan semua orang Muslim.

    Sesuatu yang lain yang saya harus meneliti isini ialah berkenaan humiliti manusia. Kita seharus berperangai yang rendah walaupun kita berada ditahap tinggi dalam politik. Kalau tidak, mungkin kita dijatuhkan pada hari nanti kelak, mungkin dalam PRU 13. Tak payahlah jadi sombong sangat kerana kuasa yang diberikan kepada sesiapa adalah dengan izin Tuhan melalui pemilihan rakyat.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ALLAH bersama orang-orang yang sabar...
    it's good that you finally speak up and defend yourself. Good luck to u

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dato0' Seri,

    Terang macam mana pun tak guna lagi pada puak jumud ni. mereka tak percaya Anwar Ibrahim liwat orang walaupun mangsa masih hidup dan buat pengakuan terbuka.

    Mereka juga tak percaya elizabeth wong tu seorang yang korup moral walaupun dah nyata beliau ada hubungan luar nikah dengan seorang lelaki Islam dari parti PKR juga.

    Tapi sebab nak pertahankan parti mereka, tuduhan-tuduhan kerajaan yang mereka kuasai terus mereka percaya walau tanpa buktti nyata. Mereka minta bukti Datuk seri bayar itu dan ini.

    Persoalannya mengapa mereka tidak pula tunjuk bukti tuduhan mereka? Malah YB Teng siap nyata lagi bahawa SPRM tidak boleh mengambil rakaman dan kenyataan saksi-saksi dalam selcat sebagai satu bukti untuk penyiasatan mereka.

    Saksi-saksi ada imuniti konon. Mengapa saksi ini perlu ada imuniti? Mereka buat tuduhan dan sekarang bagi imuniti kepada penuduh? Ini pun ada pejuang demokrasi katakan Dato Seri salah dan mereka betul.

    belajar saja tinggi... otak tetap macam budak tingkatan lima... emosi dan tidak matang.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Salam,

    Saya bukan rakyat selangor tetapi saya pemastautin di selangor. saya juga mempunyai hak mengundi selangor.

    Apa yang saya lihat sekarang terlalu banyak permainan salah menyalahkan oleh kerajaan negeri dan pembangkang selangor. agak membosankan juga.

    Untuk makluman Datuk, saya tidak nampak lagi usaha2 dan tindakan bersepadu yang dilaksanakan untuk BN negeri untuk kembali mendapat kepercayaan rakyat.

    Lain pula kerajaan negeri selangor yang begitu berusaha untuk mengekalkan sokongan ke atas mereka. pelbagai tindakan oleh mereka dapat dilihat, tidak kira samada ianya bermoral atau tidak. usaha mereka untuk terus menanam kebencian rakyat ke atas BN nampak begitu tersusun dan berkesinambungan.

    Persoalan sekarang kenapa BN selangor nampak begitu tidak bermaya dan hilang punca? atau masih lagi terkejut dengan kekalahan lepas?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Linda... ko ni bercakap guna nama allah begitu berdegar-degar tapi tulisan ko tak mencermin pun apa yang ko cuba tunjukkan kononya ko ni tidak berpihak... seorang yang takutkan allah dan sebagainya.

    Bagi aku ko ni tak lebih dari penyokong Pas totok saja yang mempergunakan nama Allah sesuka hati. Dah bayak kali aku baca komen ko... semuanya menyuruh orang lain rendah diri, mohon keampunan allah atas kesalahan yang dilakukan.

    Tapi ko sendiri dah buat ketetapan Dato Seri dan isteri dia bersalah hanya kerana tak menghadiri Selcat.

    Tak payahlah nak tulis nama Allah kata dalam tulisan ko tu... jijik aku membacanya seolah-olah ko ni dah nak jadi wakil Allah pula boleh tahu apa yang allah hendak.

    Linda tulis - Banyak alasan macam, "sebagai Chairman", "I do not know this or that because the management decided which I have no control" dll semata-matanya untuk taichi segala aksi yang Dato Seri serta isteri telah buat daripada yang benar. Bolehkah kesemuanya ini coincident?

    - Tengok tulisan ko kat atas tu. Dato Seri bertaichi untuk selamatkan diri. Tu penghakiman yang ko buat tu tak takut Allah ker? Ko boleh baca hati orang ker?

    Linda tulis lagi - Tak payahlah hujahkan disini. Berani kehadapan dan berdepan dengan SELCAT untuk menjawab soalan mereka sekiranya betul, benar dan telus. Jangan beri alasan bahawa SELCAT adalah dengan tujuan sengketa melawan. Pergi dengan hati iktibar yang tidak takut kerana Allah akan berbelah sesaipa yang tidak melakukan kesalahan, malah gagalnya berhadapan bermakna ketakutan benar diketahui. Ingat Allah masih berkuasa dan akan meneliti sesiapa yang betul dan benar atau sebaliknya.-

    Apa yang ko cakap ni Linda? kalau tak pergi Selcat kira salah atau takut? Sejak bila pula Selcat ni kena jadikan satu ukuran benar atau salah, takut atau berani sedangkan Selcat bukan mahkamah.

    Kalau aku jadi datuk Seri pun aku tak pergi... masalahnya bukan takut... tapi Allah bagi akal dan fikiran kepada manusia supaya berfikir... pilih mana yang baik bukannya suruh berani melulu. Ko kata Allah yang bakal menentukan salah dan benar...jadi apa hal ko nak sangat datuk seri mengadap Selcat tu? Takkan Allah buat keputusan berdasarkan perbincangan Selcat tu?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Penerangan yang jelas... move forward Datuk Seri. Jangan dipeduli langau-langau yang cuba membuang masa Datuk Seri kat sini. baik tumpukan kepada BN Selangor dan UMNO.

    Jawapan yang ada sudah mencukupi. Orang yang sudah berpaksi kepada satu puak atau yang suka mencari kelemahan orang memang mahu menang juga dalam perbahasan ini walaupun bila tak ada hujah maka mereka akan kata jawapan kita sebagai bodoh dan tidak memahami intelektual mereka.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Dato Sri,
    I can't help but get the impression that you were completely powerless in deciding on anything about what you did as Menteri Besar and as Chairman of PNSB. I really find that hard to believe.
    If you were what you said you were, humble, simple, let everybody decide for you, don't care where you stay, you must then be the most down to earth leader I have ever come across in my entire life. You character must certainly be even higher than Mahatma Ghandi or our Prophet Muhammad saw. I find that even harder to believe.
    I had the experience of knowing a Chairman of Tenaga Nasional Bhd. Compared to you, he was nothing. Yet his behaviour is as if he owns the world, treating everyone around him with impunity. I beg your forgiveness on this and say that I do not believe a word you say about your humility.
    It is human nature to always deny any wrong doing. Ask any thief if he has stolen things from others, what kind of answer would you expect? Ask a murderer if he killed someone, surely you know what his answer would be.
    I perceive you in complete disbelief when someone ask you about your good youthful looks and you answered "it was because of the tempeh".
    Now, that really put me off. I thought to myself, this leader that I once elected because I believe in him has the audacity to make me look stupid in believing in him.
    I saw your arrogance emerging at the time of the "tempeh" incident and I knew then that it would bring about your downfall.
    All said and done, you were spending the rakyat's money as if there was no tomorrow. Now the tomorrow that you thought never came, suddenly stares you vengefully in your face.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Macam ni lah Dr Khir,

    Mulai sekarang kita gelar dalam kempen kita...

    Kerajaan Selangor Kerajaan Ceramah.

    Lebih Ceramah dari mentadbir,
    Lebih Ketua Pembangkang dari Menteri Besar.

    Nak lagi mantap,
    Dr Khir cabar Tan Sri khalid ke debat Agendadaily. Macam Lim Guan Eng dengan Koh Tsu koon. Mesti boleh tapau punya.

    ReplyDelete
  11. kepada PEMBACA...

    botol kalau kita letak dan tanya pada 2 orang cukup.....apa yang mereka akan cakap....2 orang ini akan beri jawapan yang berbeza dalam memberi pandangan dan jawapan...belum lagi tanya 15juta orang melayu...belum lagi tanya 3 kaum utama negara.....faham2 cukup....boleh haru biru..inilah bahananya bila pemimpin atasan alpa...habis semua diungkit,remeh temeh semua ni,emosi,bercakaran,dan tidak memberi tumpuan yang jitu dalam memacu halatuju akan datang...jadi pesan saya dalam mengkritik dan menegur biar rialistik dan jadilah orang yang boleh menerima dan jangan sakit hati jika pandangan dan kritikan kita tidak boleh diterima pakai oleh yang satu pihak lagi!!!!

    dalam kes menuduh ds tidak berani berhadapan dengan SELCAT... kalau saya jadi ds pun saya tidak akan melayan dan menjatuhkan maruah saya untuk mengadap satu badan yang penuh dengan maksud yang tersirat disebalik penubuhan SELCAT yang tersurat....pakatan rakyat sebenarnya telah berjaya menjadikan isu...

    harus diingat wahai rakan semua...ds anwar telah berada dalam BN selama 16 tahun ,pernah menjadi dan menjawat pelbagai jawatan seperti menteri pendidikan,sukan,pertahanan,kewangan dan sebagai orang no 2 dalam parti dan negara...jadi semua taktik dan apa yang BN buat ada dalam pengetahuan ds anwar,celah kuku dia je....dia tahu a sampai z apa bn buat.

    umno dan bn tak berubah masih guna taktik lama...kena ketawa dan main dengan ds anwar sahaja...cuba tengok kat perak sampai sekarang jadi lawak ...mereka buat sahaja peduli apa janji jadi isu..lawak dah memang lawak..tapi apa yang sebenarnya mereka mahu?...tak lain dan tak bukan saja nak buat hal....walaupun mereka tahu mereka dah kalah tapi yang penting buat isu berpanjangan dan ganggu pemerintah dan kekalkan momentum dan mengelirukan rakyat agar rakyat tetap berkata ya...inilah demokrasi baru...melayu baru dan melaysia baru....piiirah semua ini auta sahaja...pakatan rakyat bukan yang terbaik untuk malaysia...tapi ini sebenarnya harga yang harus dibayar oleh umno dan bn atas kealpaan pemimpin diperingkat atasan selama ini..

    sukar nak fahamkan...memang dari dulu melayu bersengketa...tak tahu bila nak saling bermaafan dan tidak mahu menjadikan kesalahan dan kesilapan silam sebagai penambah baikan dimasa hadapan...mengapa kita melayu selalu suka mengungkit kisah dan keburukan seseorang melebihi kebaikan yang telah dilakukan olehnya..
    adakah ds khir tiada langsung jasanya kepada negeri ini...dan adakah kesalahan dan kekurangan yang ada pada setiap manusia itu yang akan diaibkan dan dipamerkan kepada masyarakat sehingga kita melayu ditertawakan tanpa disedari oleh orang yang melihat karenah kita dari dahulu kini dan adakah selama2nya?...

    kalau dah totok tu totok jugalah baik umno,pas atau pkr.....saya berharap masih ramai yang rasional contoh kalau dulu pangkah pas/pkr atau dap...tapi akan datang boleh beri pada umno dan bn dengan syarat 3 tahun ni umno,bn sedar dan berubah lah...... tengok mereka berubah tak...tapi kalau masih kongkalikong...lu fikir sendiri.kalau umno tak ubah dalam 3 tahun ni saya terpaksa dengan berat hati untuk undi...takbir allahhuakbar

    BERUBAHLAH UMNO SEBELUM REBAH

    ReplyDelete
  12. DSKT,
    You are just trying to make the fairies and the witch in the Disneyland fairy tales looks much better and yet it will not be real, a fairy tale will only be a fairy tale. You can read, understand & enjoy it but never to be believed. Thank You.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Pandangan & komen saya berkenaan Wawancara ini:

    a. Ternampak sangat berlebih – lebihnya layanan para pegawai Kerajaan Negeri ataupun Syarikat – Syarikat Perniagaan Kerajaan Negeri terhadap BOSS mereka secara direct ataupun tidak, keluarganya tidak terkecuali.

    Balik - balik jawapan mereka ini ialah arahan YAB Menteri Besar. Sebenarnya mereka kena mengaku bahawa mereka cuba nak membodek BOSS mereka secara terang – terangan. Bila dah terperangkap, jawapan biasa ialah arahan YAB Menteri Besar!

    b. Bagaimanakah munculnya ayat arahan Menteri Besar. Mungkin Menteri Besar komennya sedikit. Mungkin juga yang keluar daripada mulut pegawai – pegawai Pejabat Menteri Besar yang kononnya BOSS mereka mahu begitu & begini!. Ayat standard mereka ialah Menteri Besar yang suruh ni. Manusia, bila bepeluang akan mencuba pelbagai kaedah.

    Para pegawai Kerajaan Negeri ataupun Syarikat – Syarikat Perniagaan Kerajaan Negeri akan menuruti kerana nak membodek.

    c. Banyaknya wang ringgit yang habis dalam pelbagai program BALKIS seperti yang dimaklumkan melalui SELCAT menunjukkan betapa banyaknya pembaziran yang berlaku. Nampak gayanya untuk pemimpin mesti yang terbaik walaupun mahal, tetapi rakyat terus menderita kelaparan. Perjuangan kononnya untuk rakyat hanya momokan politik sahaja.
    Mahu barang yang baik guna wang ringgit sendiri!

    d. Rakyat tidaklah akan berpeluang dilayan sebegitu mewah. Tetapi pemimpin termasuklah YB. Dato’ Seri Khir Toyo perlu menegur mereka ini jika terlihat perbelanjaannya terlampau extravanganza! Tidak bolehlah kita hanya kata itu urusan Pengurusan! Perbelanjaan kena telus dan sebagai Pengerusi atau BOSS kepada para pegawai Kerajaan Negeri ataupun Syarikat – Syarikat Perniagaan Kerajaan Negeri, kita kena tegur mereka dahulu.

    Kalau tidak tidak sedarlah mereka. Bukan yang hanya berjimat ialah rakyat, tetapi pemimpin berbelanja tanpa had hingga ke hujung dunia.

    e. Bagi pelaksana arahan BOSS atau Menteri Besar, buatlah kerja anda. Dalam konteks penyapu, memang patut Jabatan Kerajaan berkenaan di beri penyapu sebab terlampau lemah dalam aspek pengurusan dan tindakan. Sudahlah kedua – duanya terletak di Hulu Selangor, janganlah pula perkhidmatan amat hulu sifatnya!

    (Mungkin YB. Dato’ Seri Khir Toyo tersilap sebab tak digunakan penyapu tersebut untuk menyapu kegagalan kedua – dua Jabatan Kerajaan berkenaan.)

    Jadi, berdasarkan artikel ini insafilah. Bukan hanya YB. Dato’ Seri Khir Toyo, tetapi semua.

    Banyak yang boleh kita nampak dan pelajari dari Wawancara ini. Saya nampaklah, anda saya tak tahu. Terpulang……

    MUSANG TERBANG

    ReplyDelete
  14. ds khir kata dia bayar sendiri kos keluarganya....tapi kenapa kenyataan ds khir berbeza dengan datin khairiyah

    persepsi saya adalah.... saya rasa ada yang buat claim double masuk poket sendiri tanpa pengetahuan ds khir atau dstin khairiyah...bukan nak tuduh tapi kena siasat...orang kat keliling ni kita kena didik dia supaya berubah kerana mereka adalah jentera utama.... jadi apa kata SELCAT siasat orang bawah selain ds khir...terutamanya orang yang uruskan pembayaran tersebut.... mungkin dia tahu lebih dari bosnya dan bila dah kena macamni yang dapat nama buruk adalah ds khir dan secara tak langsung nama parti dan kerajaan terdahulu pun rosak juga....

    sebab tu ds khir kena jawap..baru orang faham dan boleh berhujah pro-con disini......yang lebihnya kita fikir sendiri senang atau susah nak berniaga ni....cakap senag buat baru tahu...

    ReplyDelete
  15. salam..
    Telah menjasi lumrah kalau ingin mengetahui kebaikan seseorang tanyalah pada sahabatnya begitu pula ansai ingin mengetahui keburukan seseorang pula,tanyalah pada musuhnya.

    Yang penting kita mengenali diri dan perbuatan kita kerana sya yakin setiap dari kita telah di anugerahkan akal fikiran yang baik yang memungkinkan kita menjadikan akal fikiran itu sebagai penapis kepada segala yang kita baca kita dengar dan kita pandang.

    Banyak perkara kita buat walaupun betul tetap di pandang salah oleh orang yang tidak menyukai kita malah kalaupun kita salah akan di pandang betul oleh orang yang menyukai kita.Demikianlah ibarat khidupan kita kerana sejak azali kita tidak dapat memuaskan hati semua orang..yang penting kita harus terus besuara walaupun tidak semua kata-kata kita akan menyenangkan orang lain akan tetapi percayalah ada kesedaran bagi orang yang mahu sedar.

    Ingatlah jika kita nampak orang lain silap..apakah kita tidak silap ?..teruskan memberi pandangan kerana sebanyak sedikit akan ada orang yang menilai dan impaknya walaupun lambat menjadi nyata akan tetap membawa kepada kesudahan yang baik.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Salam DMKT,

    Buat lah apa yang terbaik asalkan niat nya betul. Manusia sudah lumrah dipenggaruhi oleh persepsi dari fakta. Itu lah dia kehidupan manusia malaysia dan Gulayu. Susah amat nak bezakan mana betul dan mana tatak betul, walaupun ijazah berjela dan pengalaman berkepuk tengok apa ia kata dan apa ia buat. Banyak tak berani tegur, takut mis soru dan tahta.Hidup sementara dan nikmat dipinjam aje.

    TQ DMKT

    ReplyDelete
  17. encik ajab ko sakit jiwa ka?. biar encik khir toyo menjawab.kalau encik khir toyo terjun dalam lubang taik ko pun terjun sama kan.jangan jadi bodoh.

    1. alasan"saya sebagai pengerusi" adalah alasan bongkak tak mengaku kelemahan diri seolah2 pengerusi adalah maksum tidak boleh di dakwa dakwi mana mana mahkamah

    ReplyDelete
  18. banknegara,

    1. yang ko marah sangat apahal? Biarlah aku nak komen juga dalam blog ni.

    2. Betullah tu Dr Khir pengerusi PNSB apa pulak alasan tu bongkak? Aku tak nampak kat mana-mana pun kata Pengerusi tak boleh didakwa di mahkamah. Cuma janganlah tunjuk bodoh yang salah orang lain pun ko nak dakwa pengerusi. :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. kelakar aku dengan en ajab tu bagi contoh macam ni lahh..

    -engkau ni tak semayang masuk neraka tau...

    -ape lak ko sibuk? mane engko tahu? engko tuhan ko?

    bak kata ustaz shamsudin sidek 'kita harus untuk tidak melayan cakap2 orang munafik takut2 akan bertambah kemunafikan nya wallahuaklam :)

    ReplyDelete
  20. DS Dr Khir,

    Assalamualaikum Dato' Seri. Sebagai orang luar Selangor yang menetap di Selangor dan mengundi di Selangor, saya tidak nampak apa yang Dato' Seri buat mendatangkan keburukan. Semua yang di buat semasa ada objektif untuk kebaikan dan di sebalik kebaikan itu ada juga keburukan yang kekadang kita tak boleh elak yang membawa kepada cercaan orang.

    Contohnya, bila saya lihat di akhbar suatu masa dahulu yang menunjukkan gambar Bukit Cerakah telah di gondolkan oleh projek Dato' Seri, saya juga berasa sedih kerana dalam pemikiran saya tiada lagi lah tempat tadahan hujan di Selangor ni. Bencana banjir akan menjadi jadi. Tapi bila saya dengar 'explanatioan' dat' Seri di radio, saya faham tentang expirasi Dato' Seri. Cuma kita semua kena beringat setiap sesuatu kebaikan yang nak di buat, ada 'consequences'di belakangnya Contohnya pemaju tidak mengikut spec semasa membuat kerja pembinaan yang akahirnya mendatangkan bencana2 yang membuat orang rasa tertekan dan tanpa berfikir dengan cara objectif terus tuduh melulu kononnya MB sibuk nak buat duit, rakyat yang merana. Tapi Dato' Seri memang kita akan tertekan kalau kita salah sorang yang terkena bencana ni. Cuba kita letak diri kita dalam keadaan mangsa banjir, Balik rumah dari tempat kerja tengok rumah separuh dah tenggelam, perabut terapung sana sini, mesti kita marah.

    Jadi, peristiwa2 begini boleh jadi pengajaran pada semua terutama parti BN untuk memantau sesuatu projek dengan lebih serius dari sibuk merancang sesuatu projek.

    Sudah setahun parti PR naik, di sini saya mengaku saya juga salah sorang yang memilih mereka ini, atas dasar mahu tegakkan Islam di dalam pemerintahan. Saya lihat tak ada yang baik dibuat PR selain daripada sibuk mencari kesalahan orang terutama Dato' Seri yang ironiknya memerintah di negeri yang sememangnya terkaya di M'sia. Negeri asal saya pun di perintah parti PR juga tapi mereka tak pun sibuk mencari kesalahan MB nya walaupun saya lihat MBnya lagi teruk dari DSKT.

    Saya pernah menghadiri majlis yang di buat PR yang instead of mereka menunjukkan pencapaian yang telah di buat di Selangor (maklum la saluran media mereka ini amat terhad) mereka masih membuat cerita mengapi-apai kan rakyat dengan tohmahan yang tidak berasas dan berbukti. Sedih saya bila wakil dari parti yang mau mengaangkat martabat Islam tidak berkata apa-apa tentang tohmahan ini padahal dalam Islam, Tohmahan, cacian dan fitnah amat berbahaya dan lebih bahaya dari pedang(di zaman Rasullullah dan bom di zaman kita ni) kata saudara Azmin, dia mau londeh DSKT selondeh-londehnya dan saudara Mahfuz yang ada kat situ macam menyokong saja. Mana sifat2 Islam yang mau di pertahankan? Terbukti PR sememangnya mau menjatuhkan DSKT atas agenda politik. Pencapaian yang di tonjolkan masa majlis itu ialah PR telah menghadiri majlis2 kematian dan majlis pengaduan orang ramai tanpa membuat apa-apa untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut.
    Di surau2 sekarang ni, setiap kuliah lepas magrib, di penuhi dengan kuliah agama (ada yang baik tapi kebanyakkannya lebih pada agenda politik tohmahan juga)Setiap yang di lakukan kerajaan akan di anggap salah dan di tentang sampai isu menggunakan nama ALLAH dalam semua agama pun di sokongnya. Padahal kita tahu dalam hati kita ianya akan menyebabkan memelaratan pada generasi kita.Malah ada yang menyokong Terresa Kok yang menyatakan yang pada zaman nabi mana ada microfon.

    Tolonglah.. rakyat M'sia bukan rakyat yang boleh di bodoh2kan.

    Bagi saya sekarang ni parti yang lebih menjaga lisannya, itulah parti yang akan menang dunia akhirat. bagi saya juga DSKT dah buat sebaiknya dalan menjalakan tugas beliau untuk menjadikan Selangor Negara Maju tapi mungkin dia terlepas pandang pada consequences nya. Tapi saya tak salahkan beliau kerana beliau makhluk Allah yang cuma ada 2 tangan,kaki, mata, telinga dan satu kepala. Kerja sampai 30jam sehari pun dia tak dapat melihat segala permasaalahan.
    Pada semua yang mengutuk beliau, ya boleh mengutuk kerana mulut dan tangan punya sendiri, tapi ketahuilah menjaga lisan kita adalah akhlak yang sebaiknya. Cuba tanya di dalam hati kita, apa kita bolehkah buat sebaik yang di lakukan kalau kita di beri peluang?? Besar kemungkinan tidak. Jadi sebagai orang Islam sejati eloklah berdiam dan bersuara yang lebih pada membaiki dari lebih pada mencerca.
    Sekiranya DSKT telah salah guna wang rakyat, biarlah dia yang berjawab dengan Allah kelak, apa kalau dengan mencerca dapat membaiki keadaan negeri Selangor ke arah lebih baik?? Penjelasan DSKT bagi saya jelas dan boleh diterima sebagai orang yang kuat bekerja dan tak lari dari terlepas pandang pada isu2 berbangkit.
    Pada DSKT teruskan usaha murni Dato' Seri kerana Allah saja yang tahu niat kita. Kalau baik dapat pahala dan begitu juga sebaliknya.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "tahniah" en ajab.

    en ajab ni memang berjiwa umno.

    umno sejatilah katakan.sebab itulah mentalilitinya begitu... hehehe..

    ReplyDelete
  22. Assalamualaikum dr

    BN perlu memperbaiki segala kesalahan yg pernah mereka lakukan tanpa merasa pembetulan dibuat kerana ingin untuk menarik kembalai undi,lakukan dengan ikhlas

    Tidak perlu kita mempertikaikan bagaimana undi orang muda telah berpecah atau sebagainya, yang pasti kalau permata walau diperlimbahan tetap akan bersinar

    Sistem 2 parti bagus untuk meningkatkan segala macam ilmu politik,biar rakyat yang memilih kita, tugas politikus adelah memberi yang terbaik untuk di hidangkan kepada rakyat.

    Jangan dok asyik retorik sahaja

    ReplyDelete
  23. Assalamualaikum dr

    Penjawat awam begitulah selalunya,mesti nak jaga periuk nasik maa,hendak pulak telah mendapat kata dua dari yang sedang berkuasa,(Kamu mau periuk nasi kamu aku terbalaikkan???)dan kekadang mereka yang akan lebih lebih dari menteri("Lebih sudu dari kuah")

    Jadi dr. tak pergi tu mmg baik lah,tak payah dengar ape yang melaun tarbus semua ni cakap,mereka akan berkata kata seperti selalunya,dr.mmg telah bersalah dalam kotak minda mereka,tiada apa pon yang betul dihati mereka.Hanya Anwar Ibrahim saje tak pernah melakukan kesalahan,dia lebih mulia dari semua manusia di malaysia ini.

    Meliwat memang telah diterima oleh pengikut mereka,dan pemikiran mereka telah diasuh sedemikian rupa oleh PAS dan PKR.Bahawasanya berkawan dengan syaitan juga di bolehkan,jadi ape lagi yang boleh diterangkan kepada mereka.

    Bagi saya syaitan adelah musuh kita semua umat Islam.

    ReplyDelete
  24. http://bbcatlover.blogspot.com/2009/04/tahniah-kerajaan-selangor.html

    Mohon pehak tuan salurkan maklumat ini pada pihak yang berkaitan/waris supaya diberi pelajaran kepada blogger yang celupar ini.

    http://jamilismail.blogspot.com

    saya orang jauh.. tak tahu mana nak salurkan..Port Klang dan Kota Raja saya tak pernah sampai.

    ReplyDelete
  25. ajab ni menantu dato' seri ke?
    ke ade kenen2 nak jdk menantu?!!
    membebel tak tentu pasal!!

    anyway, terima kasih atas penjelasan dato' seri..
    sungguhpun saya tak berapa yakin dgn semua jawapan2,
    sekurang-kurangnya ada beberapa point yg nampak teruk tapi taklah seteruk mana seperti yg diwar-warkan..

    sama2 lah kita bermuhasabah diri..tak mengira parti

    ReplyDelete
  26. bukan senang menjadi ketua. saya lihat banyak konflik terjadi selepas terjadinya sesuatu yang tak mengikut spesifikasi.

    Saya pernah dekat dengan pentadbiran Dato' Seri semasa belajar di asrama Yayasan Selangor dahulu. Saya lihat sebagai seorang manusia yang pernah susah, Dato' Seri memang humble. Tapi masalah yang saya dapat jangka adalah orang-orang sekeliling Dato' Seri. Sorry to say, you're wrapped up by kaki-kaki ampu yg berlagak.

    yang seboleh-bolehnya kipas Dato' Seri atas kepentingan sendiri. Kaki ampu negeri paling kaya di Malaysia, kepentingan mereka juga tentu sangat besar.

    Minta maaflah sebab perkara tu dah lama dan kalau judgement saya cuma berdasarkan dua tiga jam lawatan Dato' Seri tapi sesungguhnya pengajaran itu cukup menakutkan. Trust right people Dato' Seri.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Posting saya yang entah berapa byk.

    Ok, antara Lim Guan Eng memerintah selama setahun dgn Khir Toyo perintah lebih 5 tahun. Siapa yang lagi bagus, Miskin Tegar Kempen yg dijalankan di Pulau Pinang, telah meletak Pulau Pinang negari sifar kemiskinan. Selangor melenyapkan 5 buah KAMPUNG SETINGGAN MELAYU dalam tempoh 2 tahun. JADI MARI UNDI SIAPA LAGI BAIK, Lim Guan Eng atau Khir Toyo. Tanya budak kecil 4 tahun pon dah tau jawapan dia

    ReplyDelete
  28. Assalamualaikum dr

    Wahai tomskut

    Dimanakah anda memperolehi semua perangkaan nya? dan siapa yang menyedikannya?.
    Kalau nak ikut sedap mulut saje tak payah lah nak buat.Kamu ingat kami semua ni tunggul kayu ker?.

    Kalau betul Lim Guan Eng itu bole bertindak sebegitu cerdik, mengapa sampai sekarang dia masih menyalak macam anjing minta bantuan di segerakan projek jambatan ke2 tu?.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Azman,

    Betul atau tidak Sleangor telah lenyapkan 5 Kampung Setinggan MELAYU, SAYA ULANGI MELAYU, 3 kampung setinggang telah dapat court order utk hentikan tetapi tetap musnah. Saya ckp kat pulau pinang tu orang miskin tiada kena mengena pasal jambatan ke 2. dan LIM GUAN ENG TIDAK MENYALAK, DIA MEMINTA JANJI2 YANG TELAH DI BERIKAN SEMASA DIE BELUM PERINTAH DALAM SURAT KHABAR YANG KERAJAAN PUSAT AKAN BIAYAI PROJEK KE 2 JAMBATAN TERSEBUT. En Azman tidak baca surat khabar ke? nie bermakna En Azman bodoh kerana tidak membaca surat khabar UMNO sendiri sila, type kat google mesti keluar. Miskin Tegar di Pulau Pinang kena tanya direct dgn kerajaan di Pulau Pinang kerana tidak kuar langsung dalam surat khabar ke apa.


    Tapi saya tanya EN AZMAN BETUL KE ATAU TIDAK 5 PERKAMPUNGAN SETINGGAN MELAYU DI SELANGOR HILANG DALAM TEMPOH 2 TAHUN PEMERINTAHAN DR KHIR? dimana keperkasaan Dr Khir masa itu untuk menjulang nasib orang MELAYU?....

    ReplyDelete